eztvx.to | eztvstatus.org
Search title:  
TV Packs only
 
   Battlestar Galactica S04E04 720p HDTV x264-CTU

Username:

Password:

Login Register
[ Forum » Episodes » Thread ]

Please login to reply
[#90171] Written by: nocoolname [26/04/2008, 08:25]
patience is a virtue...

thanks for this... bg720p rules...
[#90174] Written by: smokeshaq [26/04/2008, 08:37]
22:1580 seed:leech...

let's hope leechers got their upload right...
[#90181] Written by: hierr [26/04/2008, 08:44]
frack yeah !! been waiting all night ! (just have to wait for it to come on
rapid )
[#90182] Written by: [26/04/2008, 08:46]
took so long i watched the low res version!

oh well, at least its here.
[#90180] Written by: heifer2 [26/04/2008, 08:49]
yay! cheers eztv
[#90187] Written by: OisinT [26/04/2008, 09:00]
Quote by vi76
battlestar.galactica.s04e03.internal.rnfo.720p.hdtv.x264-dimension
...



wrong episode.
[#90185] Written by: vi76 [26/04/2008, 09:01]
battlestar.galactica.s04e03.internal.rnfo.720p.hdtv.x264-dimension

http://isohunt.com/torrent_details/40927968/battlestar+galactica?tab=summary

(i also posted this here, in case people wanted this and missed it in the
thread for episode 3.)

from the nfo:

-ctu's release suffers from multiple problems. random out of
place video squares [not macroblocks,] improper playback
speed at multiple points, chromatic issues everywhere, and
overall just exceptionally poor video. [see pics and included
samples.] and the last seg floats from +100 - -300 ms out...
again.

we are aware of their inexperience with this sort of feed, and
do not know if it was for sure the source or simply poor
decoding of a much better than the encode stream. so this
time its internal. considering bev is now banned in that 'doc'
as a source due to qualitative reasons we will assume that if
it is the source's fault, you simply forgot to include it in
the banned source list and were not just trying to protect
your low quality, might as well stick with the dsr, source.

sort the issues or drop the source, or next time it will be
proper...and with 720p being about quality...we know you guys
already agree. [just get help from gnarly lol 2hd or mainevent
who can obviously do it right.]

also please note we used a non aq rev purposefully on this
and still are leaps and bounds above theirs qualitatively
[both statistically and visually] during any motion, camera
or on screen. so we will use the aq rev for most, but when we
feel it hurts the quality [like it obviously does on extremely
noisy and dark sources such as this show] we will simply ignore
that doc and pre something that looks better.

and yes for reasons like this we are proud to not have signed
that cheating encouraging, quality deprived, lame, so called
ruleset. [old size used due to old size crap original pre]

enjoy more of the best ustv 264 around
[#90188] Written by: vi76 [26/04/2008, 09:16]
Quote by oisint

wrong episode.


no shit sherlock. that's why i included the line:

(i also posted this here, in case people wanted this and missed it in the
thread for episode 3.)

and no, i didn't edit my post.
[#90191] Written by: OisinT [26/04/2008, 09:33]
Quote by vi76
Quote by oisint

wrong episode.


no shit sherlock. that's why i included the line:

(i also posted this here, in case people wanted this and missed it in the
thread for episode 3.)

and no, i didn't edit my post.


yeah, but why?
[#90192] Written by: nukuvarjo [26/04/2008, 09:45]
nice!! ty from finland.
[#90198] Written by: vi76 [26/04/2008, 11:41]
Quote by oisint

yeah, but why?


because there were issues with ep 3 and i thought that whoever goes for the
720p versions wants quality above anything else. i also didn't see any mention
of a proper (or a link).
[#90204] Written by: OisinT [26/04/2008, 13:13]
Quote by vi76
Quote by oisint

yeah, but why?


because there were issues with ep 3 and i thought that whoever goes for the
720p versions wants quality above anything else. i also didn't see any mention
of a proper (or a link).


i'm just saying please don't spam up the thread for this particular release with
information pertaining to a separate release.
thx
[#90203] Written by: Zank [26/04/2008, 13:15]
Quote by vi76

because there were issues with ep 3 and i thought that whoever goes for the
720p versions wants quality above anything else. i also didn't see any mention
of a proper (or a link).


the source was comcast and has nothing to do with ctu encoding it poorly.
comcast has simply run out of bw and compresses the streams and/or takes bw
away by knocking down their alloted bitrate for channels.

in fact this week you can blame dimension for the delay since ctu sat on
this waiting for those losers to release their so called awesome quality
that never came. should ctu wait 24 hours or just 8 for dimension to catch up? lol

furthermore, dimension is fucking clueless if they think aq has anything to do
with it. this is one reason no one cares they signed the rules. another is
they are small time and can't win shit unless they get pre air. even with
pre air ctu trounces them on total releases each week.
[#90218] Written by: st1kk [26/04/2008, 17:35]
thank you very much.
lovn this 720p!!
[#90231] Written by: fuffer [26/04/2008, 21:03]
Quote by vi76
battlestar.galactica.s04e03.internal.rnfo.720p.hdtv.x264-dimension

http://isohunt.com/torrent_details/40927968/battlestar+galactica?tab=summary

(i also posted this here, in case people wanted this and missed it in the
thread for episode 3.)


thanks a lot! better quality wins, if ctu got a bad source, then it means their
releases are inferior until they get a better source. period. better quality
wins.
ssl  EZTV RSS EZTV Status | EZTV API | DMCA: [email protected]