[#190770]
Written by: RodPowermaster [30/10/2012, 00:48]
...oh
[#190791]
Written by: Athlonite [30/10/2012, 09:01]
this ep has a glitch in it at 0:27.59
SPOILER ALERT - (highlight to read)
the only reason a truck wouldn't brake like that is if the driver was dead and failed to hit the
brakes otherwise it would take a wee while for the lack of constant pressure in the system to allow the
brakes to come on
[#190798]
Written by: xip [30/10/2012, 11:51]
Quote by brygdom
SPOILER ALERT - (highlight to read)
the last time i knew, electricity failure doesn't cause brake loss.
why does this militia feel the need to go backwards in time and look like they are wearing 1800s
uniforms?
probably because they don't have factories and the modern equipment needed to create the style you
associate with 'modern clothes' they have to create cloths manually using naturals materials(like
leather for example).
fabrics might be spun old-school by hand, which gives it a much older look compared to our modern
blend fabrics. it seems logical to me that the clothes will be more like what we had a few hundred years
back.
[#190800]
Written by: xip [30/10/2012, 13:16]
SPOILER ALERT - (highlight to read)
about the crash people mention...
did anyone consider the possibility that the truck driver simply didn't see the car since his lights was cut
out, and the other car was also in the dark with no lights? (practically invisible in the middle of the
street)
why do people always try to find faults with the most logical scenarios?.
also... why do i think of notch when i see aren? ;-)
[#190808]
Written by: RodPowermaster [30/10/2012, 17:42]
SPOILER ALERT - (highlight to read)
and don't get me started on how his flask was able to deflect a bullet fired from a revolver at
point blank range. [/spioler]
[#190814]
Written by: xip [30/10/2012, 20:08]
Quote by rodpowermaster
SPOILER ALERT - (highlight to read)
and don't get me started on how his flask was able to deflect a bullet
fired from a revolver at point blank range.
hehe didn't mythbusters try that one?
[#190825]
Written by: BoonesFerry [31/10/2012, 00:05]
i've added spoiler tags to several comments in this thread.
in the future, when discussing key elements or details of the show please use spoiler tags.
text that is entered between two spoiler tags is not visible...until it is highlighted (selected).
for future reference, please copy and paste (or type) the following text into your message:
[spoiler] replace this text with your spoiler message. [/spoiler]
repeat violations of the spoiler rule may result in a temporary or permanent ban.
[#190844]
Written by: xip [31/10/2012, 11:51]
sorry boonesferry, i normally try to use the spoiler tag, but i guess i didn't see the information as that
much of a spoiler, in hindsight, you are right of course.
[#190850]
Written by: YardBoy [31/10/2012, 12:31]
thanks 12.0x. was there a car crash in this ep? i'm so distracted by the odd faces made by charlie.
[#190863]
Written by: BoonesFerry [31/10/2012, 19:31]
@xip -- i appreciate your reply.
as spoilers go, this was very low on the scale, and i probably would not have said anything but i
recieve private messages regarding spoilers. it's all good.
enjoy
| 1 of 1 |
