[#55716]
Written by: rocketrod [14/09/2007, 15:11]
so what is wrong with the original? i don't even dare got into the message
board for the original release because i am certain that everyone is discussing
that actual content of the show and i haven't seen it so i don't want to know.
therefore, without posting spoilers about the content on this version, can
someone say if the original is worthless, watchable with minor issues etc?
[#55727]
Written by: rozi [14/09/2007, 15:44]
seconded
[#55728]
Written by: retali8 [14/09/2007, 15:51]
i watched the original and didn't notice anything.
maybe i was too into the show to notice
[#55736]
Written by: jacob07072002 [14/09/2007, 16:29]
worked fine in vlc.
[#55742]
Written by: zankuro [14/09/2007, 17:36]
says 2hd:
*quote*
oh god, another broken sorny release. where do we start.
- broken avi headers causing the avi to be unplayable in vlc and many standalones
try seeking through the rls and video goes missing, audio pops out of sync etc.
- mislabelled analog source. sorny got caught doing this in the spring on family guy
and the simpsons and now they are doing it again. last comic last night had an audio
buzz from unshielded rca cables in the last 5 minutes and now this. just look at
the overall
bluriness and color saturation compared to ours. ours is sharp and theirs has a
slight blur
which is quite ugly.
there's probably more wrong but i got a headache trying to watch this cap. proof
in sample dir
just say no to sorny.
*end quote*
i must say tho, sorny's release is still pretty darn watchable for an analog
source. sound's perfectly fine, too, stereo and all.
[#55744]
Written by: KyBoshia [14/09/2007, 18:12]
there is nothing noticeably wrong with the first one.